Multiplayerking wrote:Bambis Dad wrote:Im not wrong according to my bible, it says homos and paedos are the same. According to liberalas homos ain't making a choice, therefore we have to indulge the pansies. By the extension of that logic there should by a chain of kids set up for paedos to f**k in case we cause offence. I think you niggaz will understand I've covered every eventuality under the new rules for not causing offence. Of course I don't believe this but Ihave followed the rules.
Fine, we'll go with your logic. A gay man would have sex with another consensual gay man whose happy to take part. A paedo rapes kids against their will. Therefore, "indulging pansies" has consent from both parties. The "chain of kids for paedos to f**k" would not consent to it.
Yup. Pretty much. You could have had it all, rolling in the bored? Don't you get it? I don't care. You could go to america as a twenty one year old with your seventeen year old bride and be guilty of rape. Crispy accussed me of both that and paedophillia. I'm simply providing the platform that paedophillia is kind of okay as no t**t seemas to treat my offence with any concern.